A longitudinal EEG study · February–October 2026

The Oscillome

A longitudinal atlas of one brain's electrical dynamics, as far as fourteen scalp electrodes and a 0.2–43 Hz bandwidth can hear it: 56 recordings spanning ordinary behavior, controlled sensory perturbations and pharmacologically altered states.

56
recordings
100.1
hours of EEG
14
EEG channels
225
days spanned

01 — Overview

One brain, recorded for nine months

The Oscillome is a longitudinal N-of-1 EEG research program: 56 recordings and 100.1 hours from one adult participant, one fourteen-channel consumer headset and one montage, between February and October 2026, spanning ordinary behavior, controlled sensory perturbations and pharmacologically altered states. The altered-state subset includes four psychedelic conditions (session counts are in the evidence ledger); since September every session also carries controlled blocks — fixed eyes-open and eyes-closed periods, flicker sweeps and broadband light noise. All 56 recordings form the analysis cohort.

The project began as passive description and ran straight into its central weakness: the first headline — more alpha under psychedelics — was eye closure (§16). That failure set the direction. Comparisons are now matched on eye state where the data allow it, every claim is tested against a surrogate that could also produce it, and the newest work drives the visual system with known inputs rather than watching it (§18, §19). The evidence ledger is the authoritative statement of what each finding currently is: an observation, an association, a hypothesis, or a failure.

What the evidence currently supports

In short: nine months of one person's EEG, from a fourteen-electrode headset, on ordinary days and during psychedelic sessions. The biggest change in these recordings is not any compound but whether the eyes are open or closed: closing them makes alpha (the brain's dominant resting oscillation, about ten cycles per second) several times stronger, so every other comparison has to take eye state into account. With that in hand:

  • Alpha is faster in the LSD sessions: every LSD session sits above every ordinary one.
  • Alpha is not a pure sine wave. It carries a smaller companion at twice its frequency that rises and falls in step with it, most strongly in the LSD sessions, though eyes-closed ordinary sessions reach the same range.
  • The direction in which alpha sweeps across the scalp, from the back of the head towards the front more than the reverse, persists with the eyes closed under LSD and not otherwise.
  • Five sets of equations for the brain's cell populations, fitted to every two minutes of signal, say that over a whole recording alpha behaves like a bell struck at random: it rings at its own frequency and dies away. Minute by minute the picture is finer: with the eyes open the bell is heavily damped; closing them brings it within seconds to the edge of ringing by itself (a self-sustaining oscillation, a limit cycle), an edge that one whole-head pattern of alpha crosses in some eyes-closed minutes and not in others, on ordinary days too, and for more of the time in the psychedelic sessions.
  • Machine-learning models trained on other people's EEG tell the psychedelic sessions from the ordinary ones in 39 of 40, but those sessions also differ in time of day, room, posture and eye behavior, so the models may be reading the setting as much as the brain. They recognize the limit-cycle state and do not anticipate it. The decisive test, to fix the models and predict sessions recorded later, has now been run once: frozen in September and read on thirteen later sessions, the models called all thirteen and ranked the one psychedelic session first, where the time of day alone called eight; one psychedelic session supports a rank, not a rate, and the eye-state estimate alone also separates the thirteen, so the setting is not yet ruled out (§21).
  1. Eye closure raises posterior alpha power several-fold within a session (6.5× in the reference session; 2.2× to 7.9× in every fixed block since). It is the largest effect in the archive and conditions every comparison below (§16). Replicated within archive
  2. Alpha runs faster in every LSD-labeled session — 10.3–10.9 Hz against an ordinary median of 9.8 — and the four classes order LSD > DMT > ayahuasca > psilocybin within one person (§06, §17). Supported association
  3. Flicker drives an alpha resonance at 9.7 Hz that reproduces to 0.03 Hz across days; in one session it sat 0.3–0.7 Hz higher forty minutes after an LSD dose of a known, small quantity than in the same session's pre-dose sweep (§18). Replicated shift: single session
  4. Alpha is strongly phase-coupled to a peak at twice its frequency, most of all under LSD — evidence that strongly supports reading the “beta” peak at 21–22 Hz as a harmonic of alpha's non-sinusoidal waveform rather than an unrelated oscillation; a separate oscillator locked 2:1 is not excluded (§11). Supported association
  5. Alpha's back-to-front lag asymmetry survives eye closure under LSD and not otherwise: +0.25 to +0.35 in six of six sessions against a median of +0.01, and +0.02 before the dose against +0.41 after it within one session — the archive's first difference that holds with eye state matched, though outside the timed blocks the matching uses a classifier built from alpha itself, so it also matches partly on alpha strength (§13). Supported association
  6. Broadband light noise evokes a perceptual echo near 10.8 Hz, replicating a published effect with a consumer headset and an LED panel (§19). Replicated within archive
  7. A simple resonator is enough over a whole recording; minute by minute, with the eyes closed, it is not always. Across five neural-mass and mean-field models fitted to each of the fourteen electrodes of every two-minute window, a lightly damped, noise-driven linear resonator explains the alpha spectrum and amplitude statistics at this resolution — a quality factor of 5.5 at the median electrode-window — and it predicts: fitted to half of a recording at one electrode, the two linear models give the spectrum of the other half with R² 0.94 and 0.96 (532 recording-electrodes), and the flicker resonance of §18 from unstimulated EEG to within 0.29–0.34 Hz. The amplitude test has power at the 152 recording-electrodes with a strong alpha peak, and all 152 sit at the linear limit; a Hopf limit cycle predicts held-out envelope power better than the linear resonator in only 37 of them, by -0.0004 nats per sample, so over a whole recording nothing in the data requires a limit cycle; the next entry looks window by window. Neural-mass and mean-field models are usually fitted once per subject; we did not identify a prior study fitting them at this density to one person's archive (§20). Observed
  8. One collective mode crosses a Hopf bifurcation, and the psychedelic sessions spend more time beyond it. Read as a whole-head dynamical system, the recordings have one wave mode that approaches an instability, the front–back alpha pattern, and it crosses a supercritical Hopf point: with the eyes closed it holds a limit cycle in 26 % of minutes in LSD sessions, 37 % in the other psychedelic sessions and 13 % in ordinary ones, and almost never with the eyes open. The crossing is a drift through the point at the scale of minutes with no change at the eyes; beyond it the band condenses into that one pattern and its harmonic locks to it. A ring of Jansen–Rit columns with a front-to-back gradient crosses the same bifurcation; a homogeneous field cannot. The learned representations recognize the regime and do not anticipate it (§22). Supported association
  9. A pretrained foundation model reads the labels, but so might the room. The published EEG foundation model LaBraM, frozen, read by a calibrated read-out that never saw the session, separates the session labels in 39 of 40 held-out sessions (REVE 37); LoRA fine-tuning either on these recordings without labels adds nothing, and kept beside the frozen features it costs nothing. Residual eye behavior, setting, posture, time-of-day and other session-level nuisance variables remain entangled with the label, so the next test was prospective: the representation and read-out were frozen and read on thirteen sessions recorded afterwards (§21, Result 22): all thirteen called, the one psychedelic session ranked first, every EEG read-out better than the time of day by 0.4 to 0.6 nats per session; one psychedelic session supports a rank, not a rate. We did not identify a prior evaluation of EEG foundation models on one person's longitudinal, altered-state archive (§21). Supported association
  10. The resonator's fitted constants are complementary to the learned representations. The 41 constants of the neural-mass and mean-field models, fitted at each of the fourteen electrodes, place 38 of 40 sessions on their own, are the best single representation for two quantities no network was trained on (the long-range memory of the alpha envelope and alpha phase coupling with alpha strength removed), and given as inputs to a network trained from scratch on this archive — a network borrowing REVE's design, not a foundation model — lift it from 36 to 38 sessions (log loss 0.31 → 0.24, three training seeds). For the strong pretrained networks on the label they are redundant: those already contain what a resonator measures (§21). Supported association

What did not survive is reported at the same length: more alpha under psychedelics (withdrawn), a doubled alpha “wavenumber” (mostly eye state, §12), brighter light speeding alpha up (§19), any lasting trace across the months (§09), thalamocortical dysrhythmia (§10), and interaction between frequency bands (§13).

What limits it

  • One person, no placebo, no blinding. Repeated measurement removes between-person variability; it does not remove time, order, expectancy or setting. Nothing here generalizes without testing.
  • The session label is confounded with eye state and environment across the passive archive. Acute sessions are a median 34% eyes-closed, ordinary recordings 1.2%.
  • Fourteen scalp electrodes, 0.2–43 Hz, no source localization. Phase gradients cannot distinguish a propagating wave from a lagged standing pattern; one generator cannot be told from several locked together.
  • Unequal and mostly legacy acute sessions: 6 LSD, 7 DMT, 2 ayahuasca, 1 psilocybin. Most have no reliable dose or timing record; the September protocol records the dose and is adding minute-level timing.

Read the headlines with the ledger open

Six published conclusions from this archive were later overturned, and the site keeps them in full on the corrections page. Where a sentence says a psychedelic did something, the ledger row is the sentence that counts.

Six research programs, eight pages

Each program is a page of its own. A card gives the question the program asks, its headline finding with the grading the evidence ledger assigns it, and the sections it holds; open the card for the full analysis.

Program AReplicated within archiveOscillator physiology

The frequency, aperiodic background, burst structure and stability of posterior alpha across eight months.

Alpha runs faster in every LSD session, 10.3–10.9 Hz against an ordinary median of 9.8 Hz; nothing about it persists across the months, and thalamocortical dysrhythmia is absent.

  • §06Alpha dominates the record
  • §07Complexity, long-range memory, and burst structure
  • §08Every electrode, every band, across every session
  • §09Does any of it persist?
  • §10Screened, and absent
Open program A →
Program BSupported associationNonlinear dynamics

Harmonics, bicoherence and waveform shape; a head movement locked 2:1 to alpha.

Alpha carries a phase-locked companion at twice its frequency, strongest under LSD: the 21–22 Hz “beta” peak reads as a harmonic of alpha's waveform rather than a separate oscillation.

  • §11A second harmonic, strongest in LSD-labeled sessions
Open program B →
Program CSupported associationSpatial dynamics

Phase gradients, directional structure, pairs of waves, and what fourteen sensors cannot decide.

Alpha's back-to-front lag asymmetry survives eye closure under LSD and not otherwise: +0.25 to +0.35 in six of six sessions against a median of +0.01.

  • §12Alpha's phase gradient: mostly the eyes, a little beyond them
  • §13Watching a wave cross the scalp
  • §14A right-leaning brain — and how much of it is the headset
  • §15An office state with restricted dynamics
Open program C →
Program DReplicated within archiveAltered-state comparisons

The eye-state confound, then four psychedelic classes within one brain: what is descriptive and what is controlled.

The first headline, more alpha under psychedelics, was eye closure (6.5× within one session); with eye state matched, alpha frequency orders LSD > DMT > ayahuasca > psilocybin within one brain.

  • §16The result that fell apart
  • §17Four psychedelics, one brain
Open program D →
Program EReplicated within archivePerturbation and system identification

Pre-specified flicker sweeps, broadband light noise, the impulse response.

Flicker drives an alpha resonance at 9.7 Hz that reproduces to 0.03 Hz across days, and broadband light noise evokes a perceptual echo near 10.8 Hz; brighter light does not speed alpha up.

  • §18Driving the loop: the first resonance sweeps
  • §19Driving the brain with every frequency at once
Open program E →
Program F · 1 of 3ObservedNeural-mass models

Five neural-mass and mean-field models fitted to every window of the archive: what their constants say about this brain, and which of their predictions the recordings bear out.

Over a whole recording a lightly damped linear resonator (Q 5.5) explains the alpha spectrum and amplitude statistics and predicts held-out spectra with R² 0.94–0.96; at that scale nothing requires a limit cycle.

  • §20Five equations for one oscillation: neural masses and mean fields
Open program F →
Program F · 2 of 3Supported associationLearned representations

Representations learned from the raw waveform with nobody saying what to look for, judged on the same terms as the mechanistic models, and what they were really looking at.

A frozen EEG foundation model separates the session labels in 39 of 40 held-out sessions, but setting, posture and eye behavior remain entangled with the label: recognition, not yet prediction.

  • §21What learned representations see, and what they were really looking at
Open program F →
Program F · 3 of 3Supported associationBrain states and phase diagrams

The equations read as dynamical systems: where the alpha system changes character, which instability it approaches, and whether the recordings go there.

One wave mode, the front–back alpha pattern, crosses a supercritical Hopf bifurcation: a limit cycle in 26 % of eyes-closed LSD minutes, 37 % in the other psychedelic sessions and 13 % on ordinary days.

  • §22Where the equations change character, and whether the recordings go there
Open program F →

Also: the explorer (every recording, every metric, a full page each) · methods · corrections · version history · references. Every chart links to its data as CSV. The analysis code is under version control (v1.5.0, MIT) and is being prepared for public release; the repository is not yet public.

Dataset release 2026.09.16 · analysis release 4.26 · acquisition protocols P1–P3 (defined in Methods)

02 — Evidence ledger

Every claim, with what stands behind it

Status is graded from within-session observation (strongest, because the person, headset and day are held constant) down to exploratory association. "Proper control" asks whether the comparison group matches on eye state, activity and context. "Multiplicity" records whether the p-value survives correction for the number of tests run around it.

Observed A direct descriptive property of the archive.Replicated within archive Seen independently in several sessions under comparable conditions.Supported association Recording-level statistical evidence, but observational and confounded.Mechanistic hypothesis A compatible explanation that the data do not uniquely identify.Preliminary · single session Seen once; needs replication.Instrument-limited Possibly real, but not resolvable with this montage or device.Not supported Tested; the evidence did not meet the criterion.Withdrawn An earlier claim invalidated by later evidence (see Corrections).
ClaimStatusBasisSessionsCohortControlMultiplicityWhere
Eye closure raises posterior alpha power several-fold within a sessionReplicated within archiveBoth4 legacy sessions + 11 fixed-block sessions56Within-session; fixed eyes-open / eyes-closed block since protocol P2, 14 of 14 channels each time (2.2× to 7.9×)N/A§16, §18
Psychedelic sessions have more alpha power than ordinary onesWithdrawnRetrospective—v1None: the contrast was eye closure—§16, §23
Psychedelic-labeled sessions have lower alpha power than the eyes-closed baselineSupported associationRetrospective12–15 vs 141 (the September analysis; not recomputed on 56)Limited: one eyes-closed reference sessionExploratory§16
Alpha peak frequency is higher in LSD-labeled sessions than in ordinary recordingsReplicated within archiveRetrospective6 vs 3756Partial: every LSD session above every ordinary one; eye state and hour not matchedDescriptive§06
Alpha frequency is highest under LSD; DMT, ayahuasca and psilocybin sit together below it, in no stable orderSupported associationRetrospective6 / 7 / 4 / 256Partial: same headset, posture and broadly the hour; eye closure ranges 4–67% across sessions; dose unrecorded in legacy sessionsOne planned test (LSD vs DMT, p = 0.014); the rest is an ordering§17
Five signal features recur across all four classes (harmonic coupling, front–back coupling, burst length, spatial repertoire, weaker right lean)Supported associationRetrospective19 vs 3756No: measured against ordinary recordings that differ in eye state and settingExploratory, ten measures§17
α–2α quadratic phase coupling is strongest in LSD-labeled sessionsSupported associationRetrospective19 vs 3756Partial: eyes-closed non-psychedelic sessions also reach the LSD rangeSingle test, p = 0.0001§11
The 2α peak is the non-sinusoidal shape of alpha rather than a separate beta oscillationMechanistic hypothesisRetrospective1956Phase locking rules out independence; a 2:1-entrained second oscillator is not excluded—§11, §13
Psychedelic-labeled sessions show a steeper alpha phase gradientSupported associationRetrospective19 vs 3756Mostly eye state: eyes-open windows only, ratio 1.31, p = 0.057 (1.70, p = 0.001 over all windows); closed > open within 16 of 16 recordingsEight unmatched tests; one matched test§12
The phase-gradient difference is specific to the alpha bandObservedRetrospective19 vs 3756Same sessions; internal band contrastDescriptive§12
Alpha's wavelength or propagation speed can be read from this montageInstrument-limitedSimulation——Estimator recovers a known wavenumber at rank correlation 0.12 under this reference—§12, §13
Alpha's back-to-front lag asymmetry persists with eyes closed under LSD, psilocybin and ayahuascaSupported associationRetrospective6 LSD + 1 psilocybin + 2 ayahuasca vs 36 ordinary56Eye state matched by the alpha-based classifier, so partly matched on alpha strength (+0.25 to +0.35 vs a median of +0.01); within LSD experiment 016, +0.02 before the dose and +0.41 after; lag-free null within ±0.03One planned contrast; 21 bands scanned, only alpha directional§13
Under LSD, front–back and sideways alpha components phase-lock to each otherSupported associationRetrospective4 of 6 LSD sessions; 0 of 3 ordinary9 recordingsLag-free null per recording (0.46–0.73 vs 0.14–0.31); absent before the dose in LSD experiment 016; eye state not separatedFour cross-axis pairs averaged; one contrast§13
Waves in different frequency bands interact (mixing, nesting, steering)Not supportedRetrospective99 recordingsPhase-randomized and time-shift surrogates; slow-wave–beta nesting tracks eye movementsFour test families§13
Under LSD a head movement at half the alpha frequency appeared, phase-locked 2:1 to alpha; most of the EEG's 5 Hz line is that movementPreliminary · single sessionRetrospective1—Within-session: cross-fitted regression of seven motion signals, shifted-motion control, first hour as referenceFDR across 14 channels per test§11
Per-channel alpha wanders more and co-moves in psychedelic-labeled sessions (the wander withdrawn on 55 recordings; the co-movement weakened to p = 0.09)WithdrawnRetrospective19 vs 3655Not state-matchedExploratory; four tests§08
Desk recordings show a spatially restricted alpha field that rarely reconfiguresSupported associationRetrospective2856Rest control inadequate (two sessions)Exploratory§15
Alpha and beta are right-lateralizedInstrument-limitedRetrospective5656No cap flip, no matched impedancesDescriptive§14
Lateralization weakens in psychedelic-labeled sessionsSupported associationRetrospective19 vs 3756Not state-matched; an instrumental contribution is unresolvedExploratory§14
Pretrained EEG foundation models, with the encoder frozen and only a held-out calibrated read-out trained, separate held-out sessions by label better than the time of day doesSupported associationRetrospectiveLaBraM 39 and REVE 37 of 40 session groups (time of day alone: 27; the 41 × 14 neural-mass model constants: 38)42 recordings, 40 session groupsWhole sessions held out; CatBoost read-out tuned inside the training folds and Platt-calibrated, decisions at 0.5; time-of-day, clock + eye-state, hand-built and fitted-constants baselines; session-paired bootstrap tests; label-permutation control at the base rate; label-free LoRA fine-tuning adds nothing beyond the frozen network (frozen beside fine-tuned ties frozen for every network)Five foundation models, each frozen, LoRA fine-tuned on the EEG, fine-tuned with the fitted constants as inputs, fine-tuned on the EEG then with the constants, and concatenated with the constants at the read-out; five in-house networks; the fitted constants alone; four baselines§21
Psychedelic use left a lasting trace in the oscillatory measuresNot supportedRetrospective37 + 1956No washout gradient; time and exposure collinear42 tests per cohort; five survive FDR, all non-psychedelic§09
Frontal–posterior phase coupling, the archive's default-mode proxy, drifted over the eight months (after the mid-March recording step)Not supportedRetrospective37 + 1956Eye state adjusted; mid-March step modelled150 trend tests; FDR within family§09
Thalamocortical dysrhythmia is presentNot supportedRetrospective5656Screen against published criteriaN/A§10
Flicker drives a resonance at the spontaneous alpha frequencyReplicated within archiveProspective · pre-specified (H1)15 sweeps, 11 sessions—Each sweep against its own dark blocks; fourteen frequencies in random orderN/A§18
The non-psychedelic driven resonance is reproducible across daysReplicated within archiveProspective · pre-specified (H2)10 sweeps, 10 days (the 2 poorly fitted October sweeps excluded)—Same rig and protocol; one is the pre-dose sweep of a dosed sessionDescriptive§18
The driven resonance rises after an LSD dosePreliminary · single sessionProspective · pre-specified (H3)LSD: 1 session, 3 sweeps; psilocybin: 1 session, 3 sweeps, no shift—Own pre-dose sweep (dose: a known, small quantity); dose clock time not logged; no placebo; consistent with, not sufficient to establish, a psychedelic effectMet at +40 min in three estimators; third sweep unconstrained§18
LSD sharpens the resonance or raises its harmonic ratioNot supportedProspective · pre-specified (H4)6 resolved widths of 15 sweeps—Q unresolved on a 0.5 Hz gridN/A§18
Broadband light noise evokes a perceptual echo near 10.8 HzReplicated within archiveProspective · protocoled13 runs (11 broadband pooled)—Stimulus-locked cross-correlation against unstimulated bins; replicates a published effectN/A§19
Brighter light speeds alpha upNot supportedProspective · protocoled11 broadband runs—Drift null from 661 unstimulated eight-minute spans; luminance and time collinear (r = 0.94)One test§19
Taken over whole recordings at two-minute resolution, a noise-driven linear resonator is sufficient to describe the alpha spectrum and amplitude statistics at every electrode; within eyes-closed windows the amplitude is regulated beyond what a linear resonator allows in a substantial minorityObservedRetrospective42 recordings, 532 recording-electrodes (152 with an alpha peak of 12 dB or more)42 recordings, 1,630 windowsHopf normal form against the linear (exponential) prediction for envelope power, fitted on one half of each recording-electrode and scored on the other: better in 37 of the 152 recording-electrodes with a strong alpha peak, median gain -0.0004 nats per sample, and all 152 sit at the linear limit. Recovery test: simulated limit cycles are detected only when the alpha peak stands about 14 dB above background. Weak limit cycles hidden by filtering or a weak peak are not excluded Window by window: at electrodes with a peak of 20 dB or more the Hopf coordinate is above zero in 45 % of electrode-windows against 0.06 % of phase-randomized copies (§22)One test per recording; five models compared§20, §22
The neural-mass model constants fitted at every electrode carry information complementary to the learned representations: alone they are the best representation for two open-ended targets, and as inputs they lift a transformer trained from scratch on this archive (REVE's design, not a foundation model) and the weakest pretrained network, while adding nothing to the strongestSupported associationRetrospectiveREVE replica 36 → 38 of 40 (log loss 0.31 → 0.24); CBraMod 0.28 → 0.23; the constants alone R² 0.29 (alpha-envelope memory) and 0.30 (adjusted alpha phase coupling), the best of 41 representations42 recordings, 40 session groupsSame read-out and held-out sessions for every representation; the replica's constants effect replicated over three training seeds (pooled p = 0.009); constants as inputs versus concatenated at the read-out both scored; the constants are estimated from the EEG and carry no labelOne pre-specified comparison per network, with the fitted constants as inputs against without, on the label and three open-ended targets; the replica's effect over three training seeds§21
With the eyes open the alpha system sits far below an oscillatory (Hopf) instability; closing the eyes carries it to the edge within seconds, by the account of all five modelsReplicated within archiveRetrospective7 sessions with labeled eyes-open and eyes-closed blocks; 2,969 eyes-open and 2,309 eyes-closed windows42 recordingsEye state from the protocol blocks and from blink waveforms, not from alpha. Jansen–Rit probability of a limit cycle 0.00 to 0.71 and L1 relaxation rate 13 to 2.0 per second in every labeled session; 39 % of eyes-closed windows beyond the Jansen–Rit Hopf point against 2 % of eyes-open ones; at electrodes with a peak of 20 dB or more the Hopf coordinate is above zero in 45 % of electrode-windows against 0.06 % of phase-randomized copies. Each coordinate checked by simulation with known answersFive models, one coordinate each; paired over the labeled sessions§22
Within psychedelic-labeled sessions the alpha system's coordinates drift over tens of minutes: with the eyes closed the alpha line narrows in every session, and in LSD sessions with the eyes open the line narrows, scalp-wide phase alignment falls and the correlation length grows, which ordinary sessions do not showSupported associationRetrospective14 psychedelic-labeled sessions with enough eyes-closed windows; 6 LSD and 16 ordinary sessions with enough eyes-open windows42 recordingsSlopes within sessions and within one blink-defined eye class; sessions as units. Eyes closed: line narrows in 14 of 14 (sign test p < 0.001); no ordinary eyes-closed reference of matched length exists. Eyes open, LSD against ordinary: line width q = 0.032, scalp-wide phase alignment (Kuramoto) q = 0.032, posterior–frontal lag q = 0.032, correlation length q = 0.042; the line-width drift holds with the spread of blinks inside each window in the model (p < 0.001). Flicker stimulation and the head-motion episode excluded. Part of the eyes-closed drift follows time since the eyes closed and resets when they open21 coordinates per eye class; false-discovery rate within the eye class for the LSD contrast§22
Networks that read the raw waveform can tell a self-sustained oscillation from a noise-driven one with the identical power spectrum; spectral features cannotObservedRetrospective102 real eyes-open windows from 38 session groups, each with an injected oscillation in two versions42 recordingsPairs with one spectrum and two regimes on the same real background; read-out fitted on four fifths of the session groups; paired accuracy up to 1.00 for a clear limit cycle and 1.00 near the bifurcation, spectral features 0.48; a control pair with nothing to find. Recognition of a regime that is present, not anticipation of oneSix paired conditions and one regression; every representation that can embed a new window§22
Of the wave modes of every band, one approaches an instability: the alpha front–back mode, a whole-head dipolar pattern, which crosses a supercritical Hopf bifurcation with the eyes closed; the other alpha modes and the theta and beta modes stay at the linear levelObservedRetrospective8,069 sixty-second windows of 42 recordings; 1,302 simulated linear windows as the yardstick42 recordingsRegime borders calibrated on windows simulated from the linear model with delays fitted to recorded windows (η above zero never occurs in them; "near" in 5 %). Oscillating with the eyes closed in 26 % of LSD, 37 % of other psychedelic and 13 % of ordinary windows; 0.1 % with the eyes open in ordinary sessions. Named by its signatures: continuous growth of the amplitude, a single hump above the point, no bistability beyond the linear yardstick, no second mode crossing. Beyond the point the band condenses into the mode, the harmonic locks 2:1 and the two leading modes compete. The fifth-order (bistable) fit is not used as evidence because it reports coexistence in 9–21 % of linear windowsSix modes, six conditions; no correction§22
The alpha front–back mode switches between rest and its limit cycle at the scale of minutes with the eyes closed throughout; the transition is a drift through the Hopf point (variance falls beforehand, no critical slowing down, no flickering), and the regime exists on ordinary days with the eyes closedObservedRetrospective305 onsets of oscillation (172 with the eyes closed before and after); 118 transitions with a clear level change against 374 control moments42 recordingsEye state from blink waveforms. Rise time 7.8 s at the median (quartiles 0.56 to 27.1 s). Variance of the log size falls before the moment in 74 % of transitions against 36 % of controls (p < 0.001); the autocorrelation does not rise (p = 0.246). Sessions as units: share of eyes-closed windows oscillating 0.52 (LSD), 0.20 (other psychedelic), 0.02 (ordinary), p = 0.190; the maximum-entropy critical temperature of the alpha band is 0.88 against 0.56 (p < 0.001) and follows the oscillating shareThree precursor tests; no correction§22
A ring of Jansen–Rit columns coupled through delayed firing with a front-to-back gradient of connectivity crosses the same bifurcation with the same signatures; a homogeneous corticothalamic field with fixed geometry cannot order the three alpha modes as the recordings do; inverted onto the recordings the ring places eyes-closed psychedelic minutes just inside its Hopf line and eyes-open minutes far from it with the opposite gradientObservedModel72 columns, standard constants; 2,016 linearizations; 3,904 eyes-classified windows inverted42 recordingsRing read through the same electrodes, reference and estimators as the recordings; condensation, harmonic locking and competition reproduced with the gradient and not without it. Field model: fits with one κ per mode R² 0.92–0.99 but κ must change with the state; with κ shared the modes become degenerate; damping is monotone in κ² for every fitted set of constants. Inversion: eyes-closed psychedelic windows 2–3 units of C below the Hopf line (mismatch 0.18–0.31 per second), eyes-open ordinary windows 44 below with the sides gradient positive in 78 % (mismatch 4.3). A fitted linear model is stable by construction, so no window lies above the lineOne geometry; other arrangements would do the same§22
The published neural-mass models predict the held-out spectrum and the flicker resonance of recordings made after the freeze as well as on the cohortReplicated within archiveProspective15 recordings, 224 recording-electrodes; 7 well-fitted October sweeps56Models frozen on the 42-recording release; nothing refittedFour pre-specified predictions§20
With the eyes open every post-freeze session sits at rest; the psychedelic sessions hold the alpha front–back limit cycle; the ordinary eyes-closed range is wider than the published referenceObservedProspective15 sessions, 3,132 windows; blink witness56Pre-stated three-part statement; two parts held, one failed and is explainedOne statement§22
The psychedelic classes differ in the frequency of the alpha front–back limit cycle (LSD fastest), the locking of the first two alpha modes and the alpha–beta competition, not in the Hopf margin or the oscillating shareSupported associationRetrospective6 / 7 / 4 / 2 sessions56Blink-classified eyes-closed windows; sessions as units10 measures, Kruskal–Wallis and LSD-against-DMT tests, uncorrected§22
Representations fitted only on the published sessions separate the post-freeze sessions by label, beyond time of day and beyond the eye-state estimate on eyes-open windowsReplicated within archiveProspective49 of 55 EEG representations right on 13 of 13 sessions; 52 of 55 beat the eye-state estimate on eyes-open windows56Time of day; eye-state estimate; eyes-open windows; no flicker windows58 representations, one fixed read-out each§21

Download the ledger as CSV. Each row links to the section that carries the analysis, and each section's charts link to their own data.

03 — Where this sits

An unusual intersection

Dense single-person neuroscience has precedents — the MyConnectome project imaged one brain repeatedly for eighteen months64, and precision trials scan the same few people many times around a dose58. What is unusual here is the intersection: repeated personal EEG, ordinary-life recordings, four altered-state conditions, controlled sensory perturbation, nonlinear and spatial dynamics, and learned representations, in one evolving archive from one person.

Conventional psychedelic EEG
1 psychedelic

Almost always a single compound, usually psilocybin or LSD. We did not identify a published within-person comparison across these four classes.

Typical design
1–2 sessions

One dosing day, one placebo day, in a lab, between subjects. Individual variability becomes noise to be averaged away rather than the signal.

This archive
4 psychedelic classes

LSD, DMT, ayahuasca and psilocybin, from the same skull, the same headset and montage, the same eight months.

A between-subjects study asks what psychedelics do to people. This asks what happens in this brain. Repeated measurement removes between-person variability; it does not remove time, dose, order, expectancy, setting or eye state.

What makes it unusual

  • Four psychedelic classes in one nervous system. LSD, DMT, ayahuasca and psilocybin share 5-HT2A agonism but differ sharply in receptor promiscuity and kinetics. Comparing them between subjects confounds the psychedelic with the person. Here the person is held constant — though dose, order and setting are not — and §17 makes that comparison directly.
  • More non-psychedelic recordings than acute ones. Most naturalistic psychedelic work has no non-psychedelic comparison at all. This archive has more non-psychedelic hours than acute — which turned out to matter enormously (§16).
  • Eight months of continuity. One headset, one montage, one person, one pipeline, from February to October 2026. Longitudinal drift can be measured rather than assumed absent.
  • Neural-mass models and foundation models on the same data. Five neural-mass and mean-field models fitted to every electrode of every window, five pretrained EEG foundation models and transformers trained in-house on this archive alone are fitted or applied to every window of the archive and judged on the same held-out sessions — the two literatures rarely meet on one dataset.
  • Ordinary life included. Office work, meetings, evenings at home. The mundane recordings are not filler — one of them produced the most personally useful finding here.

What it cannot be

  • Not a clinical study. Fourteen saline electrodes, no source localization, no normative database, no blinding, no placebo.
  • Not generalizable. Every number describes one person. That is the design, not a flaw — but it means nothing here transfers to you without testing.
  • Not dose-controlled. Most legacy acute sessions have no reliable dose or timing record. The protocol introduced in September records the dose (a known, small quantity in LSD experiment 016) and is adding minute-level timing; legacy and prospectively recorded sessions are kept distinct throughout.
  • Not free of confounds. The most important result on this site is a demonstration of how badly one confound distorted an initially exciting conclusion.

04 — The instrument

Fourteen electrodes, and what sits beneath each one

Every number on this site comes from one consumer headset. Before the findings, here is what it records, where its fourteen contacts sit, and which parts of the brain lie under each one.

The cortex under the headset: the fsaverage19 pial surface — an MRI average of forty adults, every sulcus and gyrus real — colored by lobe from the Desikan–Killiany atlas18, with cerebellum and brainstem below. Each of the fourteen sensors is projected straight down onto the nearest cortex. The projection shows the scalp region and the cortex nearby, not the source of the electrode's signal: a scalp electrode records a blurred, reference-dependent mixture of many generators. The thalamus, a leading candidate for pacing the alpha oscillation of §06, is marked at its true position in the center, beyond the reach of any scalp electrode; nothing on this site measures it directly. Drag to turn; it rotates on its own otherwise.
Device
Emotiv EPOC X

Wireless 14-channel EEG. Sensors are felt pads wetted with saline, held against the scalp by spring-loaded arms on a flexible band. Sampled at 128 Hz with roughly 0.2–43 Hz bandwidth, referenced to the recording system's CMS/DRL pair on the arms behind the ears (Methods), with a nine-axis motion sensor that this archive uses for the tremor screen.

The montage
14 of the 10–20 sites

"10–20" is the name of the international electrode-placement standard21, not a count: it places sites at 10% and 20% steps of the nasion-to-inion and ear-to-ear distances, so a name like F3 means the same spot on every head. The EPOC X occupies fourteen of those sites — AF3 F7 F3 FC5 T7 P7 O1 on the left, mirrored on the right (AF and FC come from the finer 10–10 extension). Odd numbers are left hemisphere, even are right; the letter gives the lobe. It is a lateral montage: nothing on the midline, and nothing over the motor strip.

What it cannot see
Depth

Scalp EEG records the summed field of millions of cortical neurons under each contact, blurred by skull and scalp. Deep structures — thalamus, hippocampus, brainstem — are never recorded directly; their influence is inferred from the oscillations they impose on cortex.

Channel by channel

PairScalp positionApproximate cortical projectionFunctions usually attributed to that cortexWhere it appears on this site
AF3 / AF4Anterior frontal, above the eyebrowsFrontopolar and dorsomedial prefrontal cortexPlanning, self-monitoring, emotional regulation, working memory. Also the channels closest to the eyes, so the first to catch blink and eye-movement artifact.Frontal alpha; asymmetry frontal-polar pair; artifact rejection
F7 / F8Lateral frontal, above the templeInferior frontal gyrusLeft (F7) sits over Broca's area — speech production, syntax. Right (F8) — vocal prosody, response inhibition, emotional tone.Frontal–posterior coupling; asymmetry frontal-lateral pair
F3 / F4Superior frontalDorsolateral prefrontal cortexExecutive control, working memory, attention switching. The classic site for frontal alpha asymmetry studies of approach versus withdrawal.Asymmetry frontal-mid pair; office-state topography
FC5 / FC6Fronto-central, in front of the earVentral premotor cortex and posterior inferior frontalMotor planning, action understanding, speech motor sequencing. Muscle from the temporalis reaches here in gamma.Topography; asymmetry frontocentral pair
T7 / T8Mid-temporal, above the earMiddle and superior temporal gyri; auditory cortex; hippocampus lies deep beneathHearing, language comprehension (left, near Wernicke's area), music and voice (right), memory. The site most contaminated by jaw and neck muscle, and T7 is this headset's second-worst contact.Muscle-limited gamma; asymmetry temporal pair; the aperiodic-slope lateralization
P7 / P8Low on the back of the head, above and behind the ear — the sites formerly named T5 / T6Posterior middle temporal gyrus at the temporo-parieto-occipital junction; the angular gyrus and fusiform cortex adjoin it. Despite the P in the name, the cortex directly beneath is temporal, which is where the 3D map places them.Visual object recognition; reading and the visual word form area (left); face recognition (right); spatial attention. Strong alpha and the seat of the alpha–2α harmonic.The "frozen" office signal; asymmetry parietal pair; harmonics
O1 / O2Occipital, at the back of the headPrimary and secondary visual cortexVision. Where alpha is strongest, where eyes-closed alpha appears, and where the eye-state confound of §16 lives.The pacemaker; posterior alpha frequency; phase-gradient direction

These anatomical labels describe the scalp region and nearby cortex, not the neural source of the electrode signal. Volume conduction spreads every generator across many electrodes, and fourteen contacts are too few to invert that mixing (no source localization is attempted anywhere on this site).

The four posterior channels — P7, P8, O1, O2 — carry most of the alpha under the headset's own reference and are the basis of every "posterior alpha" number here; re-referenced to the common average, the same oscillation is a front–back pattern of the whole head whose frontal-pole amplitudes are nearly as large (§22). The four frontal channels — AF3, AF4, F3, F4 — define the frontal end of the frontal–posterior coupling measures. The asymmetry section pairs each left electrode with its mirror.

The five bands, and what each one means

EEG is described in frequency bands because the brain's wave patterns cluster there, not because the boundaries are real. Each band has a characteristic generator, a characteristic meaning, and a characteristic way of fooling a consumer headset. Every number on this site is measured above the 1/f background: the raw spectrum falls steadily with frequency, and a band's power is only interesting once that slope has been removed and a peak is left standing.

BandRangeWhere it comes fromWhat it usually meansOn this site
Delta δ1–4 HzSlow cortical and thalamic oscillations; the dominant activity of deep sleep. In a waking recording, mostly eye movements, blinks and electrode drift.Deep sleep, anesthesia, or, in the awake adult, pathology. Awake delta is treated here as artifact until proven otherwise.Removed by the artifact screen; delta asymmetry vanishes once the 1/f slope is corrected (§14).
Theta θ4–8 HzHippocampal and frontal-midline networks during memory and effortful attention; drowsiness; in the dysrhythmia model, a thalamus firing in burst mode.Working memory and navigation when frontal and brief; drowsiness or a slowed alpha when posterior and sustained.Almost never rises above background in this archive (§06, §10); the one exception, a ~5 Hz occipital peak in LSD experiment 016, is dissected in §11.
Alpha α8–13 HzDistributed posterior corticothalamic loops contribute to alpha generation; both cortical and thalamic generators are implicated, with their relative roles depending on region and state (an active research question). Strongest at O1, O2, P7 and P8 with eyes closed.Relaxed wakefulness with visual input gated out; it collapses when the eyes open or attention turns outward. Its center frequency is a personal constant that slows with fatigue and age.The pacemaker of §06, the eye-state confound of §16, the spatial phase structure of §12, the harmonic of §11 and the driven resonance of §18.
Beta β13–30 HzSensorimotor and frontal cortex; a status-quo signal that rises when a motor plan or a cognitive set is being held and drops before a movement.Active thinking, motor readiness, anxiety and stimulants when broad; but a narrow peak at exactly twice the alpha frequency is more likely the harmonic of a non-sinusoidal alpha wave. Strong phase coupling supports a harmonic interpretation rather than an unrelated beta oscillator, although a distinct oscillator entrained 2:1 is not uniquely excluded.§11: under LSD the "beta" peak at 21–22 Hz is best explained as the alpha harmonic. Genuine beta share falls in acute sessions.
Gamma γ30–45 HzFast local cortical networks binding features into percepts; but from the scalp, overwhelmingly jaw, neck and forehead muscle.Feature binding and attention in intracranial work; on a consumer headset, mostly a muscle-tension meter.Reported only after the muscle screen, and never as a finding on its own; the headset's usable bandwidth ends at 43 Hz.

Two consequences follow. First, a peak is defined by its frequency and its phase relations, not by the band it lands in: a 21 Hz peak that is phase-locked to a 10.5 Hz alpha is part of alpha (§11), and a 5 Hz peak that is not phase-locked to it is a separate oscillation, whatever the band names say. Second, the fastest and slowest bands are the ones most easily faked by the body — muscle at the top, eyes and skin at the bottom — which is why this archive spends most of its attention on the middle.

A consumer device, read with that in mind

Saline felt dries over an hour and contact quality drifts. A five-detector artifact screen — blinks and eye movements, accelerometer-detected movement, contact quality, amplitude excursions and jumps — removes about a fifth of each recording before anything is measured (a median of 21.6%; 71.4 of 100.1 recorded hours survive); it is described in full in the Methods section (§25). Two contacts, P7 and T7, are flagged as degraded in about a third of all windows across the archive, which is why the asymmetry section treats their pairs with suspicion. The strength of the dataset is not the instrument; it is that the same instrument was worn on the same head through every state it describes.

05 — The archive

The archive

Every session, every metric. Sort any column, filter by state, and click any row to open that recording's complete analysis — spectra, topography, coupling, and every measure with archive context. The archive covers February to October 2026.

About the participant

The archive follows one adult participant. Analysis is conducted by the project author. Participant identity is not publicly disclosed. The analysis involves no clinical training. Nothing here is medical advice, and nothing here is a recommendation about psychedelic use.

Filter
DateRecordingStatePsychedelic MinClean %α freq α × bgwPLIDFA LZsSwitch/hTremor

Download this table as CSV · Session manifest (CSV): one row per recording with its label, class, dose record, acquisition protocol, eye-state source and stimulation flag, the metadata every section is meant to agree with · α freq = posterior alpha center frequency (Hz, aperiodic-corrected). α × bg = alpha peak power above the 1/f background. wPLI = frontal–posterior alpha phase coupling. DFA = long-range temporal correlation of the alpha envelope. LZs = spatiotemporal Lempel–Ziv signal diversity. Switch/h = alpha spatial-state reconfigurations per hour. Tremor = 8–12 Hz ÷ 2–8 Hz head-accelerometer power.

Which analyses include the newest recordings

Not every section has been recomputed on the same set. Each analysis section now opens with an analysis basis line giving the dataset release, how many recordings went in, what was left out and the analysis release that last recomputed it; the same information is in the evidence ledger. Every analysis of Programs A to E uses the 56-recording cohort of the October 2026 release (19 psychedelic, 37 ordinary), recomputed in analysis release 4.26; channel dynamics uses the 55 recordings long enough to window. Program F's models were frozen on the 42-recording release of 16 September and the fourteen later recordings are scored prospectively against them (§20–22). Recordings that contain stimulation contribute only their unstimulated time, and each pass states where a September window-level analysis has not been rerun. Two caveats: Resting baseline 003 part 2 keeps 2.4 clean minutes once its sweep is removed, so its values are placeholders; and the office sessions from September onward are desk work with a rest block and stimulation runs, pooled with the earlier office recordings once that time is masked.

27 — Contact

Get in touch

Questions, corrections, requests for the raw recordings, or ideas for the next experiment — write to outreach@theoscillome.com. Corrections are especially welcome; four of them are already published above.

Code. The analysis code is under version control (v1.5.0, MIT) and is being prepared for public release; the repository is not yet public.

theoscillome

A single-subject EEG archive: 56 recordings, 100.1 hours, 19 acute sessions, four psychedelic classes, 34 photic resonance sweeps, thirteen light-noise runs, one brain, February to October 2026. All 56 recordings form the analysis cohort.

theoscillome.com
February–October 2026
Non-diagnostic research